Part 581 pdf

IMSLP does not assume any sort of legal responsibility or liability for the consequences of downloading files that are not in the public domain in your country. Creative Commons Attribution 3. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4. Work Title Clarinet Quintet Alt ernative. Contents 1 Performances 1. Larghetto 2. Minuetto 2. Allegretto con variazioni 2. Anthony McGill clarinet. Boston: Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum. Javascript is required for this feature. Performer Pages William McColl clarinet. Performers Midi.

Plate W. Mineola: Dover Publications , n. Pub lisher. Leipzig: Eulenburg , n. New York: E. Kalmus , n. Editor Ernst Fritz Schmid Plate BA Editor Maurizio Tomasi. Mutopia Project, Plate Leipzig: C. Peters , n. Editor Jean-Pierre Coulon b. Instrument C : low-note octave changes left to the performer Adapt lines of the engraving file to obtain either version. Arranger Bernhard Runge-Mutzke.

Editor Henri Brod Leipzig: J. Reissue — n. This file is part of the Sibley Mirroring Project. Arranger Gustav Adolf Glossner b. Vienna: Universal Edition , n. Details You May Also Like. Details: Creators:. Suntay, Brian ; Stammen, Jason ;.

Suntay, Brian ; Stammen, Jason ; Less -. Corporate Contributors:. United States. Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ;. DOT HS ;. Resource Type:. Tech Report ;. Geographical Coverage:. United States ;. Corporate Publisher:. The objective of this study was to determine if it was possible for a single bumper design to perform well with respect to both pedestrian protection and Part bumper damageability requirements.

To investigate the bumper damageability side of this question, the test conditions most relevant to pedestrian protection were conducted: the 2. Under each of these tests, the vehicle must meet certain damage criteria specified in Your letter focuses on the damage criteria listed in Emphasis added. As you discussed in your letter, NHTSA has issued interpretations regarding what equipment may be part of the bumper face bar.

You expressed concern that those interpretations might indicate that bumper-mounted AEB sensors would not be part of the bumper face bar, and would therefore have to meet the damage criteria of You also stated that the prior interpretations indicated NHTSAs intent to decide whether particular components are part of the bumper system on a case-by-case basis, and asked that NHTSA conclude that bumper-mounted AEB sensors are in fact, components of the bumper system because they help to perform a protective function with respect to frontal collisions, and should therefore not be subject to the damage criteria of We agree that the question of whether particular components are part of the bumper system is properly decided on a case-by-case basis.

The answer to that question will be determinative of whether bumper-mounted AEB sensors need to meet the damage criteria of the bumper standard that is, whether they must withstand the pendulum and barrier tests with no damage. NHTSA has consistently interpreted the bumper face bar as including components that are integral parts of the bumper face bar, or are needed to attach the bumper face bar to the chassis frame, like shielding panels, tape strips, and certain types of grilles that, like the bumper, serve a load-bearing, protective purpose.

Rather, they are more clearly akin to the other sensors and lamps NHTSA has previously found to be subject to the damage requirements of Part The fact that AEB and bumper-mounted sensors that may be part of an AEB system helps to mitigate damage in low-speed collisions does not make AEB sensors integral parts of the bumper face bar. They would therefore be exterior surfaces subject to Your letter suggests that some bumper-mounted AEB sensors may require realignment to facilitate proper system operation following Part testing.

Given that AEB systems on a vehicle are part of that vehicles braking system, in the event damage to an AEB sensor during Part compliance testing causes any of these systems not to operate in a normal manner, the vehicle would not comply with Part Such an exemption may be an effective interim approach for some manufacturers until they are able to develop AEB systems that comply with Part , or until that regulation is amended through rulemaking to address bumper-mounted standards differently.

We remain confident that your members will be able to speed the introduction of AEB into the marketplace in ways that comply with applicable vehicle requirements, and that bumper-mounted AEB sensors able to meet the damage criteria of Part [10] will build consumer confidence in these new systems.

We look forward to working with you further to speed the introduction of effective AEB systems throughout the fleet.